By Patroclos
THERE is no more entertaining spectacle than watching two alpha males of Kyproulla’s ruling elite that contributed, in their own way, to the current economic catastrophe, taking swipes at each other in an effort to avoid personal blame and protect their standing in our easily-fooled society.
I refer to the once mighty Ttooulis Ttoouli, former minister and ex-Governor of the Central Bank who on Friday returned the fire he was under, a week earlier, from once-mighty Kikis Lazarides, former executive chairman of Laiki Bank. They both used the investigative committee for the economy as the platform for their respective attacks.
Their dispute is over who was to more to blame for the arrival of the destroyer of Laiki, Andreas Vgenopoulos to Kyproulla. Ttooulis was the head of the supervisory authority of the banks, as Governor at the time, while Kikis was the executive chairman of Laiki who laid the red carpet for Vgen.
These pillars of the dishonest society we live in, despite being in their seventies, have not lost their appetite for a fight, more than happy to land imaginary punches below the belt, for the lightweight title of innocence. The fight will be over now that Ttooulis also had his say at the geriatric committee and kicked Kikis ass.
The bout ended in a draw, neither able to convince that they were blameless. On the contrary, each made a very convincing case of the other’s guilt, in opening the doors to Marfin’s silver-tongued bankster.
IN FRIDAY’S appearance Ttooulis landed several blows, informing his fellow golden oldies on the panel that Vgen’s intention to buy 19 per cent of Laiki had created “euphoria and an atmosphere of enthusiasm among the Laiki leadership.”
He also mentioned his meeting in June 2005 with HSBC’s Europe CEO, who informed Ttooulis that the bank wanted to have more control in Laiki. If HSBC could not increase its shareholding to 50-plus per cent it would sell its 21 per cent holding. The CEO was ‘frustrated’ with lack of control HSBC had despite being the main shareholder; it only had one director on the board, Kikis and his allies refusing to give it second seat.
After the meeting Ttooulis contacted Kikis to tell him to try to satisfy HSBC, but in September he was informed that no deal had been reached and the bank planned to withdraw from Laiki by the end of 2005. If HSBC had not pulled out, Laiki would still have been in business today, lamented Ttooulis in another dig at Kikis.
He was absolutely right and although he did not spell it out, it was clear what he was trying to say – Kikis had rejected HSBC’s proposal, for his own reasons. Presumably, because he would cease being the numero uno, supreme ruler of Laiki if the foreign bank had the majority shareholding.
The autocratic Kikis would not even agree to HSBC having two directors on the board in case his absolute powers were diluted, despite its shareholding more than justifying a greater representation. The scheming Kikis, brought in Vgen instead, in the belief he would keep his powers but a few months after taking over, the bankster forced him out, which was poetic justice. The money launderer’s euphoria did not last long.
TTOOULIS may have done everything in his power to keep HSBC in Laiki, but he did not try as zealously to keep Vgen out. He told the committee that the Central Bank had prepared a “thorough and documented report” before Vgen was allowed to take his 19 per cent share in Laiki. Even though the report had not been completed, when Ttooulis gave the go-ahead, the information it was awaiting was of secondary importance.
But if the report was so “thorough and documented”, why had it not identified the link between the two Vgen-controlled companies – Tosca and Marfin – that were buying the shares in Laiki as separate and unlinked entities?
In June 2006, Kikis said in his testimony, Ttooulis sent a letter to Vgen informing him that he had “unconfirmed information” that Marfin was engaging in the purchase of Laiki shares during the closed period, which was against the law, and if he found this to be true he would declare the Marfin deal with Laiki null and void.
This was more like a blackmailer’s letter. Would a Governor of a Central Bank send a warning letter based on gossip, which is what “unconfirmed information” is? Surely he would investigate the information and if it was confirmed take action, instead of informing the suspect before he investigated him.
In the event, Ttooulis, despite doing his best, failed to get the confirmation he needed and could not take the threatened punitive measures against Vgen, with whom, he subsequently enjoyed very cosy relations.
THEIR RELATIONS were so cosy, that when Ttooulis’ term as Governor was nearing its end in April 2007, Vgen sent a letter to then president Tassos Papadopoulos urging him to extend it for another five years.
Only in Kyproulla would a bank boss feel he has the right to propose the identity of the man in charge of the banks’ supervisory authority, but this was because Vgen and Ttooulis seemed to have developed a bond.
This bond was strengthened in November 2006, a few months after Vgen took control of Laiki, he hired Ttooulis’ son-in-law as marketing executive at Laiki on salary well in excess of 100 grand (pounds) a year. “Of course, I had no involvement in the matter,” Ttooulis told the golden oldies on Friday.
Ttooulis’ family-owned banking school, which he set up when he was Governor, meanwhile, was also selling services to Laiki. In fact it was offering banking training courses to employees of all the banks. Of course, he had no involvement in the banking school, which was owned by his wife and daughter nor would a man of integrity like Ttooulis use his position to persuade the banks to send their employees there.
HIS DAUGHTER, Athina, who owns the banking school with the Mrs Ttooulis, was the same daughter whose company received €1 million, in consultancy fees, for 10 years, paid in advance, by a Greek shipowner and close associate of Vgen in June 2007.
Before opening the banking school, Athina worked at the Bank of Cyprus and was considered a very mediocre employee of very average intelligence by colleagues. It is still great mystery to her former colleagues how someone of her very limited abilities and knowledge could command €1 million as a 10-year retainer for consultancy services.
The idea of Athina as a highly-paid consultant of a shipowner was about as believable as Christofias becoming head of the European Central Bank, said one ex-colleague.
SO WHO is more to blame for Vgen’s takeover of Laiki, Kikis or Ttooulis? Kikis is definitely more culpable as he found the bankster and sold him to Laiki’s shareholders a the saviour of the bank, but then again Ttooulis, apart from ordering a “thorough and documented report” that, in retrospect, turned out to be not very thorough, did nothing to stop him apart from sending him a warning letter citing “unconfirmed information,” that was never confirmed.
AKELITE politicians were in mourning all week because the co-op credit banks would lose their identity and people-centric philosophy as a result of the deal struck between the government and the troika, whereby the co-ops would come under state ownership.
This was inevitable given that the state would be providing €1.5bn for the capital needs of the bankrupt co-ops. The commies, who should have been celebrating given AKEL’s dogmatic support for state ownership of everything, did nothing but cry all week because the co-ops would no longer belong to their members.
Deputies from other parties also lamented the passing of the clapped-out co-ops which have always been a sacred cow for the political parties. They all argued that the members should eventually be allowed to buy their shares back from the state, even though they all know this happy day would never come. What is the likelihood of members of the co-ops raising the €1.5bn to buy back their shares, this century?
EDEK deputy Giorgos Varnavas, in a statement, said that the co-op movement “must carry on operating on a different basis from the rest of the commercial banks and maintain its human face towards the Cypriot people.”
The “human face” and “people-centric philosophy”, the politicians are always referring to is a coded way of saying that the co-ops should carry on their policy of not putting any pressure on customers who were not repaying their loans. The co-ops had a human face because they gave loans that you never had to pay back.
This was officially confirmed at the House commerce committee on Friday when the Central Bank revealed that the non-performing loans at many co-ops were over 50 per cent of their portfolios. For medium-sized co-ops NPLs were 60 per cent but for many small ones the percentage reached 80 per cent.
The taxpayer will be paying €1.5bn for the human face of the co-ops.
CENTRAL Bank Governor Dr Panicos informed the House committee that the NPLs of the co-ops proved higher than had been forecasted by Pimco’s extreme-case scenario for the commercial banks. The percentage of the NPLs was lower for the commercial banks because they did not have a human face.
A year ago, when Professor Panicos was publicly lambasting the banks, he was categorically stating that the co-ops were robust and sound operations that did not require any support. But the truth was that they were in a much worse state than the banks. Had he based his findings on any concrete information or was the independent state official merely repeating what his Akel masters had ordered him to say?
SEVERAL regulars accused our establishment of a inconsistency and weakness, because last week it expressed its admiration for the IMF’s representative Delia Velculescu. They noted that in the past we had referred to her as Cruella and ‘deleterious Delia’, whereas last week we were praising her sexy voice and attractiveness.
Of course they were correct, and I would like ask for their understanding because members of the male species are fickle and superficial beings who are easily won over by a pretty face and sexy voice. So from now on our establishment will be writing only about the dishy, delightful, delectable and delicious Delia.
THE STANDARD of the education of many of the smaller colleges operating in Kyproulla might not be very high, but you have to admire the inventiveness and business acumen of their owners. When Noble Energy confirmed there was natural gas in our EEZ, the colleges started advertising courses on sea-drilling, hydrocarbons etc. In the last couple of weeks, one college has been advertising a degree course in ‘Casino management’. It probably organised the course before the government decided to grant just one casino licence, when we thought that a casino would open in every neighbourhood.
RYANAIR may be known as the budget airline, but when it comes to squeezing money out of its customers its ruthlessness is quite astonishing. A mother and daughter who were flying out of Paphos 10 days ago had arrived at the airport without their boarding passes and were informed that they could have new ones issued at the airport. The cost for each new boarding pass was €75 and if they did not pay they could not fly. On the return fight, from Stanstead, the mother’s suitcase weighed 15.7kg, exceeding the maximum by 0.7kg. She had to pay £30 penalty. There is nothing budget about Ryan Air’s penalty charges.