By Patroclos
BEING principled and sensitive souls, we Kyproullians were quite shocked by the totally hypocritical stance of the detested West, which includes our duplicitous EU partners, towards Mother Russia’s bloodless invasion and occupation of Crimea.
Mother Russia may have violated the territorial integrity and sovereignty (where have we heard that before?) of the Ukraine, but this was primarily a humanitarian operation aimed at protecting the ethnic Russians, who are the majority of Crimea’s 2.3 million population that was never under threat from anyone.
Our newspapers which reflect the sensitivities of the population were quick to point out the West’s disgusting hypocrisy. Simerini, the flag-bearer of high ideal and principles, wrote in Wednesday’s lead article that “the reactions of the US and EU to the intervention of Russia in Crimea, compared to the reactions until now, for the big crime committed by Turkey against Cyprus provoke feelings of disappointment, but also frustration for the hypocritical policy of these powers towards Cyprus.”
The paper points out indignantly that with regard to Turkey’s crime, “which constitutes a crime against humanity and continues for 40 years, the US, UK, EU and the whole western world not only failed to take a stand in support of the victim, but for many years now acquits Turkey and show tolerance….”
The West would have every reason to protest about Mother Russia’s behaviour if it had done the same in the case of Turkey, the paper argued and concluded: “The politics of hypocrisy, followed on issues of principle, is a boomerang that is already turning against the Western world.” This passionate hatred of the West, even by ultra-nationalist right wing papers, is the biggest achievement of AKEL’s propaganda machinery.
IT IS INTERESTING to note that Simerini referred to Putin’s invasion and occupation of Crimea, which will be followed by secession in week’s time, as an ‘intervention’. Strangely, it is the same term always used by Turkey to describe its invasion and occupation of Cyprus.
The editorial avoided condemning Mother Russia’s ‘intervention’ giving the impression that hypocrisy is a bigger crime, more deserving of a scathing attack than the conquest of another country’s sovereign territory. Perhaps the editorial writer did not realise that failing to condemn an invasion and occupation, because it was perpetrated by Mother Russia, might be construed as a bit hypocritical.
‘THE HYPOCRISY of the West’ was the headline of the AKEL mouthpiece Haravghi which felt duty-bound to point out the “supposed invasion by Russia in Crimea and elsewhere in the Ukraine, of course, has nothing to do with the truth.”
The commie rag also spoke of Mother Russia’s ‘intervention’ which it believed was fully justified. “It does what any other country would have done to protect its subjects, its citizens, its people. Why does Russia’s attempt to protect Russian citizens constitute expansionism but the open intervention of the West – over who will govern the country – is considered a lawful and acceptable act?”
Maybe it is considered expansionism because Ukraine’s sovereign territory has been taken over and will become part of the Russian Federation’s territory. Not even Turkey has done that in the north – at least not yet – but by Haravghi’s logic it has every right to be there and protect its subjects, its citizens, its people.
And anyone who claimed otherwise is as hypocritical as the West.
OUR GOVERNMENT, to its credit, betrayed Mother Russia by supporting the position adopted by the hypocrites of the EU. If we still had comrade Tof as our president there was no way he would have stood for this hypocrisy and would have opposed any condemnation of Moscow by the European Council.
PRINCIPLED Paphite demagogue Yiorkos Lillikas took the stand he believed would win him votes. He fully supported Mother Russia’s invasion and occupation and issued a stern warning to Nik’s government.
“The Cyprus government must in no way agree to the imposition of any sanctions against Russia. At this moment Cyprus needs allies and it is imperative that we restore our relations with Russia as they have been hurt in the last few years. We must restore our co-operation with Russia and not undermine it further by agreeing to vote for any sanctions.”
Yiorkos stance is not as shallow and unprincipled as it seems. By siding with Russia and alienating the evil West he is hoping the latter would lose the interest it has shown in trying to solve the Cyprob. A Cyprob solution would bring to an end the opportunistic political career of Yiorkos, which is why it should be avoided at all costs, even if it means supporting the invasion and occupation of Crimea.
THIS TALK about our valued co-operation with Russia and Moscow’s alleged support of Kyproulla is one of the biggest myths ever served to public. And it is not surprising that it is peddled by a fantasy salesman like Lillikas.
Yiorkos did not read the interview given by his fellow Paphite Archbishop Chrys to Greek magazine Epikera last month. Below is what Chrys said about Moscow’s support for Kyproulla.
“All countries have their own interests. The big powers have interests in Turkey. Cyprus is small. Indeed, when I was in Moscow in the summer, for the celebrations of the 1025 years of Christianity in Russia, I had the opportunity to see President Putin. This is exactly what he told me: ‘I cannot go to war, we have interests in Turkey. We have interests that earn us 100 billion euro a year.’ You understand.”
THE PROUD people of DIKO, that Ethnarch Junior likes to talk about, are revolting against their young and immature leader, who has taken his rhetoric about pride too literally. What a big miscalculation he made in pulling out of the government and depriving his proud people of the spoils of power.
Junior is so out of touch with the ordinary DIKO members he thought that as long as they had their pride they would be content. He did not realise that they would want something more tangible than his insane Cyprob rhetoric to feel proud – like public positions, promotions, government contracts, union privileges etc. But he cannot deliver these now that he has chosen a life in opposition.
The principled opportunism of the self-serving, former leader Marios Garoyian was much more in tune with the true spirit of DIKO, the average follower of which always asks ‘what’s in it for me’, before making a political decision.
Immature Junior has still not understood this which is why, three months after becoming leader, he has lost control of the party and many proud people of DIKO are furious with his childish, over-reaction to the joint declaration.
COMMERCE and Industry Minister Giorgos Lakkotrypis, showed the true spirit of DIKO last weekend when he quit the party in the hope that Prez Nik would keep him in his post. Had he stayed in the party he would have lost his ministerial post. It is exactly what you would expect from a Garoyian protégé.
Lakkotrypis is one of those ministers who is thought of highly by the uncritical public and always receives a positive press. Why, nobody really knows. Perhaps it is his clean-cut image or the fact that he has not been a target of the opposition. I might be prejudiced but I think it is difficult to take seriously someone who was made minister on the recommendation of Garoyian.
It is not even as if Lakkotrypis has done anything to justify the high regard in which he is held. We still do not know what the policy on hydrocarbons is, because all that Lakkotrypis has done was to dismantle the bodies set up by the previous government and set up new ones that would hire new staff.
Will Dikheads still be appointed or will they be excluded now that Junior has chosen pride over rusfeti?
JUNIOR tried to heal the wounds of the party by calling a meeting of the executive office on Friday, but it merely confirmed the divisions. According to press reports he tried to win over some of the dissidents by offering them inclusion in the DIKO ticket for the European Parliament elections in May, but there were no takers.
No such problems at DISY where there were too many members offering to stand. Everyone was surprised that the party’s deputy leader Lefteris Christoforou, a closet Akelite, would be standing. Lefteris, a classic village politician, would be as out of place in Brussels as a penguin in the desert, unable to practise the motor-mouth demagoguery for which he is famous.
It is a weird decision now that he has become the second-in-command of the party, but he has had to sacrifice his ambitions for the good of his family. Apparently his wife was an employee of Laiki who lost her job and Lefteris’ income is not enough for the family’s needs. As an MEP he would earn three times as much as he earns as a deputy in Kyproulla and ensure that his family would carry on enjoying the standard of living it was accustomed to.
WILL the Prez also get rid of our negotiator, the teddy-bear-faced Andreas Mavroyiannis, now that he does not have to pander to DIKO? One of the conditions set by DIKO for backing Nik in the presidential elections was the appointment of a negotiator because DIKO voters did not trust Nik to handle the talks.
Mavroyiannis had the approval of Garoyian, as he had worked loyally as a Tassos diplomatic henchman back in the days of the referendum. Mavroyiannis was a smart choice because, like Lakkotrypis, he is a media darling that always gets a positive press and would not attract criticism from any quarters. After all, he loyally served both Tassos and Tof.
Nice Nik was never a great fan of the Teddy lookalike and I suspect that he does not trust him completely as he had been an anti-settlement hardliner in the past. This was why last month the prez appointed legal eagle Polys Polyviou as a member of the negotiating team.
Apart from having greater legal expertise and a much better command of English, Polys, I hear, is also expected to keep an eye on Mavroyiannis, just in case he slips into his hard-line tendencies.